Jump to section
It is the first question a new client asks, usually before they have finished sitting down. How long will this take? And the honest answer, the one that makes lawyers wince, is that it depends. That is true, but it is also useless to someone whose life is on hold. So let us do better than that, and break a civil claim into its real parts.
A civil lawsuit is not one long wait. It is a series of stages, each with its own pace, and most of the calendar is spent between them rather than inside them. If you can name the stages for a client and give an honest range for each, you replace anxiety with a rough map. Nobody remembers a promise you kept. Everybody remembers one you broke.
From Statement of Claim to Close of Pleadings
The opening stretch is the most predictable part of the whole file, which is exactly why it fools people. You issue the claim, arrange service, and wait for a defence. The rules give a defendant a set number of days to respond, and in many provinces that clock stretches when the defendant is served outside the jurisdiction or asks for more time, which they usually do.
Add a counterclaim, a third party, or a motion to strike, and the tidy opening turns into its own small proceeding. Still, in a straightforward two party matter you can reasonably tell a client that pleadings will close within a few months of issuing the claim. That is the one number early on that tends to hold.
Tip. Diarize the defence deadline and the limitation period the same day you open the file. A calendared date you actually see beats a date buried in a memo you will never reread.
Why Discovery Takes Longer Than Anyone Expects
Discovery is where optimistic timelines fall apart. Documentary discovery sounds simple until you are the one collecting eight years of emails from a client who deletes nothing and organizes less. Then come examinations, scheduling around three or four calendars, followed by undertakings that trickle in for weeks after everyone thought the day was over.
None of this is dead time in the sense that nothing is happening. It is the opposite. It is the part of the file that decides the case. But from the client's chair it looks like silence, because the visible court events are months apart while the real work happens in your office and the other side's.
Discovery is not a waiting period. It is where the case is actually built or dismantled. A working truth of civil practice
For a modest claim, discovery might wrap in a few months. For a document heavy commercial or professional negligence file, a year is not unusual, and that is before you factor in an expert whose report you cannot finalize until discovery is done. This is the single biggest reason the honest answer to how long is longer than the client hopes.
The Quiet Months Between Steps
Here is the part clients never anticipate. The largest block of time on most files is not any single step. It is the gaps. Registry backlogs, a mediation date eight weeks out, opposing counsel on parental leave, an examination that cannot be booked until the fall. These pauses are structural, not a sign that anyone has forgotten the file.
Naming the quiet months in advance is one of the kindest things you can do for a client. When you tell someone at the outset that there will be a stretch where nothing appears to move, you turn a frightening void into an expected part of the process. When you do not, every silent week feels like neglect, and that is when the anxious phone calls start.
Note. A short status note during a quiet stretch, even one that says there is nothing to report and here is why, costs you five minutes and buys you a client who trusts the process.
What Actually Moves a File Faster
Some things genuinely shorten the road, and it helps to be candid about which ones are in your control and which are not.
| Factor | Effect on timeline |
|---|---|
| A client who answers document requests promptly | Large. This is the biggest lever either of you can pull. |
| Narrow, well pleaded issues | Meaningful. Fewer contested points means less to discover and argue. |
| Early, realistic settlement discussion | Large. Most civil claims resolve before trial, and sooner is cheaper. |
| Cooperative opposing counsel | Real but unpredictable. You do not choose the other side. |
| Court and registry capacity | Outside your control. Plan around it, do not fight it. |
Notice how many of the fast levers depend on the client rather than the court. That is worth saying out loud in the first meeting. A client who understands that their responsiveness is a scheduling factor tends to become a responsive client. Keeping documents, deadlines, and correspondence in one place rather than scattered across email helps too, which is part of why firms lean on a system like A1 CMS to keep a matter's moving parts visible.
Answering the Blunt Version of the Question
So, blunt version. A simple, well behaved civil claim that settles after discovery might run twelve to eighteen months from issuing to resolution. A contested matter that goes to trial commonly takes two to three years, and a complex or appealed file can run longer still. Those are ranges, not promises, and you should say so plainly.
The trick is to give the range and the reasons together. When a client hears two to three years attached to the actual stages, discovery, scheduling, the quiet gaps, it stops sounding like an excuse and starts sounding like a plan. If they want a deeper read on the money side of the same file, the disbursements checklist pairs well with the timeline conversation, and the broader family and civil practice pieces cover the human parts of a long file.
The clients who stay calm through a two year lawsuit are almost never the ones who were promised speed. They are the ones who were told the truth early, in stages they could picture, and then kept in the loop through the quiet parts. You cannot make a civil claim short. You can make it understood, and that is most of what the client is really asking for when they ask how long.
