Jump to section
Every January, small firms write a plan. Revenue targets, a new practice area, maybe a hire. A few months later, the plan is a document nobody opens. The work of actual files buried it. This is not a discipline problem. It is a planning horizon problem, and the fix is to stop planning a year at a time.
A firm of two to ten people does not run on annual arcs. It runs on the next set of deadlines, the next intake, the next payroll. So the planning cycle has to match that rhythm. Ninety days is short enough to see the finish line and long enough to move something real. Here is how to run it without turning it into another meeting nobody wants.
Why annual plans stall by March
A twelve month goal asks you to predict a year of a business you cannot predict. You do not know which files will settle early, which client will disappear, or which staff member will give notice. So you guess, you set a number that feels ambitious, and then the first surprise makes the number meaningless. Nobody adjusts it, because adjusting feels like admitting failure. It just quietly dies.
The other failure is that annual goals have no built-in checkpoint. Twelve months is too long to feel accountable in month two. There is always time to catch up, right up until there is not. A quarter forces the question every few weeks: are we actually moving, or just busy?
Note. A shorter cycle is not about lowering ambition. It is about making the ambition survive contact with a real caseload. You can still aim high across four quarters. You just commit in chunks you can steer.
Three goals is the ceiling, not the floor
The instinct is to list everything the firm should improve. Resist it. In a firm this size, everyone wears three hats already, and every goal you add competes with billable work for the same twelve hours. Pick three goals for the quarter. Three is the ceiling, not a starting point you build up from.
If you cannot choose, that is the signal that you have not decided what matters most this quarter. A useful test: could you explain each goal to a new articling student in one sentence, and could they tell whether it is done? "Improve client communication" fails that test. "Every new matter gets a written scope and fee letter within two business days" passes it. One is a wish. The other is a thing you either did or did not do.
Keep the three balanced. One goal on the work itself, one on how the firm runs, one on the future. A practice management improvement, an operations fix, and one growth or people move is a healthy spread. If all three are revenue, you have written a budget, not a plan.
Tying goals to the hours you actually have
This is where most plans go wrong. They set targets against revenue you hope for instead of hours you have. A goal that needs forty hours of partner time in a quarter where the partner is already at capacity is not a goal. It is a wish with a deadline.
So do the arithmetic first. Add up the discretionary hours across the team for the quarter, the time that is not spoken for by existing files. In a small firm that number is smaller and more honest than anyone expects. Then price each goal in hours before you commit to it.
| Goal | Rough hours needed | Who owns it |
|---|---|---|
| Standardize the intake and fee letter flow | 15 | Managing lawyer |
| Clear the aged receivables over 90 days | 10 | Bookkeeper plus one lawyer |
| Launch one referral relationship | 8 | Associate |
Now compare the total against your discretionary hours. If the goals need more time than you have, you cut one. You do not squeeze all three in and hope. Honest capacity math is the whole game. If you want to see where those discretionary hours are hiding, a light look at utilization tells you more than any gut feeling. A simple ledger of who owns what, checked against real time entries in your practice tools, keeps the plan tethered to reality rather than optimism.
Tip. Assign a single owner to each goal, never a committee. Shared ownership in a small firm means no ownership. The owner does not have to do all the work, but they answer for whether it moved.
A monthly checkpoint that takes ten minutes
The quarter needs three checkpoints, one a month, and each should take ten minutes. Not an hour. Ten minutes. The whole point is that it is too small to skip. Put it on a recurring slot, ideally attached to something you already do, like a Friday reset or the first coffee of the month.
The checkpoint asks three questions per goal. Did it move since last time? What is the next concrete step? Is anything blocking it? That is all. You are not rewriting the plan. You are checking a pulse.
A plan you check monthly is worth ten plans you write in January and never open again.
If a goal has not moved in two consecutive checkpoints, that is a decision point, not a guilt trip. Either it was never realistic for this quarter, or it needs a different owner, or something bigger is in the way. Name it and act. Cutting a stalled goal in month two is smart resource management. Dragging it to the end of the quarter just to avoid admitting it stalled is the opposite. If a lack of clear ownership keeps surfacing, that often traces back to how the firm runs day to day, and the fixes in simple SOPs tend to help more than another goal ever will.
Closing the quarter without the blame
At day ninety, you close the quarter in one short session. The temptation is to grade yourselves and move on. Do something more useful. For each goal, mark it done, partly done, or not started, and then ask the only question that matters: why. Not to assign fault. To learn what your firm can actually absorb in a quarter.
You will find a pattern within a year. Maybe you consistently overestimate discretionary hours by a third. Maybe process goals get done and growth goals slip because they lack a hard deadline. That pattern is the real output. It makes the next quarter's plan sharper than any template could. Feed what you learn into how you set the next three goals, and each quarter gets more accurate.
Keep the close blameless on purpose. In a firm where people sit ten feet apart, blame poisons the next quarter before it starts. The goal was too big, or the timing was wrong, or a file blew up and ate the hours. All of that is information, not indictment. Firms that treat the close as a learning session run the cycle for years. Firms that treat it as a report card quietly stop after two.
Start with one quarter. Pick three goals, price them in hours you actually have, own each one, and check them monthly for ten minutes. When you close in ninety days, you will know more about how your firm really operates than a year of aspirational planning ever taught you. If you want to keep going, browse the rest of the operations writing and pick the next small thing to fix. The cycle is short by design. That is why it survives.
